Hasbro opened a 600,000-square-foot distribution center in Midway, Georgia, built and operated by GXO Logistics. The facility collapses Hasbro’s U.S. distribution network from five nodes to three, sits near the Port of Savannah, and is the first U.S. facility Hasbro has developed and branded under its own name, according to the company. Colin Regnier, Hasbro’s SVP of global logistics and planning, told Supply Chain Dive the hub is expected to generate approximately $8 million in annual productivity savings.
The more operationally significant detail for Walmart’s replenishment teams is the two-to-three-day reduction in order lead times the facility enables. Hasbro designed the Georgia site to serve both brick-and-mortar retail partners and DTC operations from the same footprint, meaning the infrastructure improvements are not siloed to one channel.
The Midway site joins existing nodes in Chino, California, and Joliet, Illinois. Chino serves the West Coast; Joliet covers the Midwest and Northeast; Georgia anchors the Southeast corridor. Regnier told Supply Chain Dive the structure also functions as a resilience play: proximity to Savannah gives Hasbro an alternative port entry if disruptions affect West Coast or Gulf shipping lanes.
That resilience argument deserves scrutiny. Five nodes give a supplier more routing flexibility than three, and the Georgia site accounts for roughly 25% to 30% of Hasbro’s U.S. distribution footprint, according to Regnier. Hasbro is trading geographic redundancy for overhead efficiency and tighter operational control. Whether that trade improves or degrades inbound reliability for Walmart’s DC network depends on execution, specifically on how well Hasbro integrates carrier routing and appointment scheduling through the consolidated structure. A purpose-built facility with reset carrier rates and tighter DTC integration can sharpen inbound predictability. A consolidation that concentrates volume without corresponding improvements in planning discipline tends to surface its weaknesses during peak season, when Walmart’s must-arrive-by-date windows tighten and the cost of a miss compounds.
The productivity savings projection should be read alongside Hasbro’s retailer exposure. Hasbro’s 10-K filed in February 2026 reports that Amazon and Walmart together represent approximately 20% of Hasbro’s 2025 net revenues. That concentration means Walmart-specific service failures carry outsized commercial consequences. OTIF chargebacks on meaningful Walmart purchase order volume compound quickly when a single retailer accounts for a significant share of total revenue.
Hasbro’s Operational Excellence program has delivered nearly $800 million in gross cost savings since inception, per the company’s Q4 2025 earnings call. The Georgia facility is one piece of a broader supply chain restructuring that includes reducing overhead, resetting lease structures, and integrating DTC volume into the same physical infrastructure as retail fulfillment. Regnier told Supply Chain Dive that consolidating overhead and resetting lease models, combined with bringing DTC volume into the facility, was what made the cost savings work. A 10-year lease through May 2036, with two five-year renewal options, locks in the three-node configuration across multiple Walmart joint business planning cycles.
For Hasbro’s Walmart-facing supply chain planners, the Georgia opening is most usefully tracked through OTIF scorecard cycles rather than through the productivity savings figure. The facility’s Southeast positioning shortens transit lanes to Walmart’s DC network in the region, which creates the conditions for tighter inbound scheduling. Whether those conditions translate into improved inbound performance is a function of planning discipline as much as physical infrastructure.
Hasbro’s Q3 2025 management remarks noted that by 2026 the company expects approximately 30% of its Toy and Game revenue to be sourced outside China, with U.S. manufacturing capacity expanding alongside that shift. A domestic sourcing base paired with a purpose-built, branded distribution network points to a supplier structuring itself to compete on service level, not just on product and price. For Walmart, a supplier that shows up more reliably is worth more at the line review table than one whose cost savings stay on the supplier’s income statement.