Walmart’s Orange Ratings Keep Climbing. Its Allegation Count Just Fell By A Third.

Walmart opened 754 cases alleging supply chain misconduct by suppliers during fiscal 2026, according to the FY2026 ESG report the company published July 29. The prior year the figure was 1,163. The decline is roughly 35%, and it arrives alongside an expansion of the monitoring program that produced it.

The multi-year line is more interesting than the single-year comparison. Walmart’s FY2024 ESG reporting, still posted on the company’s corporate site, puts cases at 714 in FY2022, 822 in FY2023, and 975 in FY2024. The FY2026 report adds 1,163 for FY2025 and 754 for FY2026. Case volume rose in each of the three years through FY2025, climbing more than 60% above the FY2022 figure, before dropping to a level that sits just above where the series began. One caution on reading that line: it is assembled from two Walmart reports published two years apart, and Walmart states in both that it may adjust figures for updated data or structural changes. The two documents already give different audit-coverage country counts for FY2024.

Scrutiny moved the other way over the same period. Walmart assessed 16,700 third-party responsible sourcing facility audit reports in FY2026, up from 13,300 in FY2025. Supplier-disclosed facilities in active status rose to 26,300 from 24,700, and audits were conducted in 83 countries against 77 the year prior. The reporting channels widened too. Walmart’s FY2024 reporting described a global helpline available in 11 languages. The FY2026 report puts it at 29 languages, alongside an ethics website available in 10 and a dedicated email address.

Orange Ratings Rose In Every Interval The Two Reports Cover

The middle of Walmart’s audit distribution has been improving, and quickly. Green ratings, indicating a high level of compliance with the Standards for Suppliers, accounted for 36.8% of assessed audits in FY2026, up from 30.6% in FY2025 and 24.7% in FY2024. Yellow ratings, indicating general compliance, have fallen in each of the four years since FY2022, from 68.8% to 49.9%. For the first time in the disclosed window, fewer than half of assessed audits came back Yellow and more than a third came back Green.

Orange has gone the opposite direction without interruption. Walmart’s own figures put it at 7.2% in FY2022, 8.7% in FY2023, 10.7% in FY2024, 12.3% in FY2025, and 12.7% in FY2026, an increase in each of the four intervals the two reports cover. Orange is the rating Walmart assigns where audits surface more serious violations, and the company continues sourcing from those facilities while remediation proceeds. Red, which Walmart assigns where it identifies violations serious enough to justify suspending or permanently ending a facility’s ability to produce for the company, came in at 0.5% in FY2026, the highest figure in the five years of disclosed data and more than double the 0.2% recorded the year before.

Walmart flags a limitation on reading any of this as a survey of supplier conditions. Facilities in regions the company assesses as higher risk are audited more frequently than facilities in lower-risk regions, so the rating distribution skews toward higher-risk sites by design. Region risk levels are assigned using British Standards Institution indicators, and prior audit results set re-audit frequency.

Walmart Stopped Publishing The Metric That Tracks The Path To A Red Rating

Walmart’s Audit and Assessment Policy and Guidance states that three consecutive Orange ratings may result in a Red rating. Through FY2024, Walmart published the share of facilities receiving a second or third successive Orange rating: 1.4% in FY2022, 1.6% in FY2023, and 1.8% in FY2024. That figure does not appear in the FY2026 report. In the year Orange reached its highest disclosed level and Red more than doubled, the disclosure that would show how many facilities are moving through that sequence is no longer available.

Two related disclosures also went. The FY2024 report stated that 83% of Orange ratings assessed that year were first Orange ratings, which the company presented as evidence that facilities generally remediate successfully. It also reported that more than 40% of cases originated from sources other than the audit process, offered as an indicator that worker voice channels were functioning. Neither appears this year. The second omission is the one suppliers should note, because without it there is no way to tell from the outside whether the FY2026 decline in cases came from the audit channel, from the hotline, or from both. Walmart restructured this year’s report substantially, and consolidation is a sufficient explanation for any of these changes. For a supplier trying to read the trend, the practical effect is the same either way.

The Caseload Shrank. Its Composition Inverted.

Walmart’s FY2024 reporting includes a full allegation category table, which makes a two-year comparison possible with one caveat: the category set is not identical across the two reports. Unauthorized production, covering facilities producing goods Walmart did not authorize, fell from 390 cases to 146. Involuntary or underage labor fell from 170 to 131, and safety conditions from 69 to 41. Two categories moved sharply the other way. Employment practices rose from 59 cases to 117, and integrity from 44 to 112. A category Walmart labeled proactive site visits, carrying 37 cases in FY2024, is absent from this year’s table, and the reports do not say where those cases now sit.

Unauthorized production remains the single largest category despite the drop, and it carries the most direct commercial consequence in the program. Walmart’s supplier requirements state that a supplier found producing merchandise in an unauthorized facility, or subcontracting to one, may become ineligible to do business with the company. The exposure attaches to the undisclosed production itself rather than to any labor finding at the facility.

Facility Disclosure Is Where This Lands On 1P Operations

Walmart’s disclosure requirements attach to merchandise categories rather than to suppliers generally. Suppliers must disclose any facility used to produce private and exclusive brand merchandise for resale, any Walmart-branded goods not for resale, and any product where Walmart is the importer of record, with additional disclosure required in markets Walmart assesses as high risk. The Standards for Suppliers apply to all suppliers selling products to Walmart for resale or for Walmart’s own use, and Walmart expects those requirements to be passed down to raw material, component, and ingredient suppliers as well as to subcontractors and agents. Walmart’s responsible sourcing guidance routes suppliers to disclose through Retail Link, with a separate path for markets that do not use it.

The operational gate sits at the front of the relationship rather than after it. New facilities producing goods where Walmart will be the importer of record must be audited and receive an acceptable result before production begins. Where the facility sits determines how high the bar goes. Walmart assigns region risk levels using British Standards Institution indicators, and a supplier bringing a new facility online in a higher-risk region must obtain a third-party audit and receive a Green or Yellow assessment before that facility can produce for Walmart at all. Prior audit results then set re-audit frequency, with an Orange rating triggering more frequent reauditing than a Yellow.

Marketplace Sellers Answer To A Different Instrument

None of the disclosure, audit, or color rating apparatus above extends to third-party Marketplace sellers. Walmart addresses sellers through separate documents. The Prohibited Products Policy governs goods sold on Walmart.com and the company’s other online platforms and states that Walmart’s global prohibition against forced labor applies to Marketplace sellers. The Marketplace Seller Code of Conduct requires sellers to operate in compliance with applicable Marketplace policies, rules, and guidelines, and the FY2026 report notes that failure to comply may result in removal of listings, account suspension, or account termination. Walmart’s FY2024 reporting located the seller forced labor prohibition in a document it called Standards for Sellers, so the instrument has changed as well as the emphasis. A 3P seller files no facility disclosures and receives no color ratings, and nothing in the FY2026 responsible sourcing data describes the Marketplace population.

One figure has barely moved through all of this. Walmart reports that it stopped doing business with 19 suppliers over the prior five years as a result of serious standards violations. The same rolling metric read 20 in FY2025 and 19 in FY2024, when it covered 2019 through 2023, leaving the count effectively flat for three years while the ratings distribution shifted at both ends. The company reports that allegations handled through this process over the last two years have included the payment of recruitment fees by workers in Southeast Asia, underage labor in the United States and Asia, and the use of involuntary prison labor.

Winning With Walmart

Winning With Walmart is an independent platform for suppliers, sellers, solution providers, and industry experts.

Articles are developed by staff editors, contributing experts, and trusted partners.

Some are researched and drafted with the assistance of AI tools and are reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by Winning With Walmart editors before publication.

Editorial judgment, sourcing decisions, and final approval rest with the publication's human editors in every case.

We are committed to accuracy and fairness. If you believe this article contains an error, we welcome your feedback.