Site logo

Coffee Was June’s Best Deflation Story. July Took It Back.

The June Consumer Price Index, released Tuesday, recorded nonalcoholic beverages down 1.5% for the month, led by a 2.0% decline in coffee, a rare bright spot in a grocery basket where eggs rose 4.3% and dairy 1.2%. The futures market spent the following two weeks taking the other side. Arabica coffee traded around $3.28 per pound Wednesday, up more than 20% over the past month, after a run in early July that gained roughly 16%, its largest gain since 2000, and pushed prices above $3.50 for the first time since January. The move traces to Brazil: Safras & Mercado reported the 2026/27 harvest at just 52% of planted area by July 1, against 60% a year earlier and a five-year average of 55%, with June rains delaying fieldwork before an abrupt turn to dry conditions raised bean-quality questions. Volatility ran hot enough that ICE raised margin requirements on coffee futures twice in a single week, draining liquidity as funds closed positions. Prices have pulled back from the spike on drier harvest forecasts, but the month’s repricing stands.

June’s Shelf Relief Was Policy. July’s Pressure Is Weather.

The distinction suppliers should carry into line reviews is why coffee was deflating in the first place. The first half’s relief had a policy engine suppliers should not expect to fire twice: the Supreme Court’s February ruling struck down the IEEPA tariff regime, CBP had paid out $71.1 billion in refunds including interest as of June 29 per its July 1 filing with the Court of International Trade, and coffee products carried exemptions under the November executive order that preceded the ruling. Tariff relief flows through invoices and, eventually, shelves. The July move is different in kind. It is weather and supply, concentrated in the origin that grows roughly 40% of the world’s arabica, and no court ruling refunds a delayed Brazilian harvest.

Smucker’s Guidance Assumed the June Bottom Would Hold

J.M. Smucker’s June 9 earnings call is the document that makes the reversal concrete, because the company’s entire fiscal 2027 framework rests on the assumption July just tested. The Folgers, Dunkin’, and Café Bustelo parent, which buys roughly 500 million pounds of green coffee annually, primarily from Brazil and Vietnam, guided fiscal 2027 net sales down 3% to 4% specifically because it plans to pass lower green coffee costs through to consumers, with guidance assuming mid single-digit deflation in green coffee costs and sequential price decreases beginning in its second quarter. CEO Mark Smucker told analysts that “coffee is a pass-through category” and that the company passes costs through in both directions, prudently and in a justified manner. The reductions executed so far are temporary, through promotions and discounts for retailers and shoppers, with no commitment yet to permanent price cuts. The context for that caution sits in the company’s own filings: its U.S. Retail Coffee segment ran a 21.9% profit margin in its fiscal third quarter against 28.2% a year earlier, meaning two years of price increases covered sales but not margin. All of that architecture was set on June 9, the same session arabica bottomed below $2.40 per pound at a 19-month low. The futures board has since added more than a dollar to the assumption underneath it.

Cocoa Is Testing the Same Bet at Hershey, on a Shorter Clock

The confection input tells a messier story, and suppliers should present it that way rather than borrow coffee’s clean narrative. Cocoa traded near $5,800 a ton this week, up roughly 46% over the past month, after heavy rains in Ivory Coast and Ghana flooded roads and cut farmers off from ports, and after Barry Callebaut, the world’s largest cocoa processor, reported its first quarterly volume increase in more than two years. But the July 9 spike to an eight-month high of $6,455 has already partially retraced on evidence of ample supply, with Ivory Coast farmers shipping 2.09 million metric tons this marketing year, up 21%, and prices remain roughly a quarter below a year ago. The honest summary for a holiday-reset conversation: cocoa’s direction turned sharply this month, and its level is still favorable versus last year.

What gives the move its stakes is the guidance it tests. Hershey’s 2026 framework, set in February, projects a 30% to 35% rebound in adjusted EPS, explicitly built on easing cocoa. That follows a year in which adjusted EPS fell 32.7% and fourth-quarter gross margin compressed 17 points as cocoa and tariff costs overwhelmed successive price increases. A 46% one-month move in the input that framework assumes is easing puts real weight on Hershey’s next print, which is expected in late July.

What the Gap Means on Each Side of the Desk

For 1P suppliers in coffee, confection, and baking, the asymmetry is the point. Walmart merchants will arrive at second-half conversations holding a June CPI showing these aisles deflating, days after Walmart pressed thousands of summer Rollbacks across grocery, and holding supplier guidance that promises pass-through of falling costs. Suppliers will arrive holding a July futures board that repriced their core inputs by 20% to 46% in a month. Both sets of documents are real. The suppliers who fare best will separate the policy-driven relief that already passed through from the commodity pressure that hasn’t yet, because a merchant can reasonably ask why prices should rise while the CPI falls and the category leader plans decreases, and the answer requires exactly that distinction. Conagra, on its call Wednesday, named beef, oil-related inputs, and logistics as the inflation it plans to price against. Coffee and cocoa suppliers just received theirs.

For 3P Marketplace sellers in coffee and candy, the exposure runs faster and thinner. Smaller brands carry less hedging and shorter contract cover than the majors, so a 20% input move reaches their unit economics in weeks, not quarters. Sellers should be repricing against landed cost now rather than waiting for the category’s big brands to move, and should expect that if the majors hold their deflation plans while inputs rise, the squeeze lands hardest on whoever has the least cover.

The number worth writing down is the spread itself. Coffee on Walmart’s shelf, per the CPI, just got 2% cheaper, and the category leader plans more of the same. Coffee on the futures board just got 20% more expensive. Spreads like that resolve; they do not persist. Hershey reports in late July and Smucker’s first-quarter print follows in late August, and those two calls are where the market learns whether the guidance built at June’s lows survives July’s weather.

Winning With Walmart

Winning With Walmart is an independent platform for suppliers, sellers, solution providers, and industry experts.

Articles are developed by staff editors, contributing experts, and trusted partners.

Some are researched and drafted with the assistance of AI tools and are reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by Winning With Walmart editors before publication.

Editorial judgment, sourcing decisions, and final approval rest with the publication's human editors in every case.

We are committed to accuracy and fairness. If you believe this article contains an error, we welcome your feedback.

Comments

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Contact

    Sign Up For Our Newsletter

    Select options...

    Winning With Walmart is an independent platform and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Walmart Inc. or its affiliates. References to Walmart, its trademarks, or its brands are for informational and educational purposes only and do not imply any partnership, sponsorship, or commercial endorsement.

    The views and opinions expressed on this site are those of the individual authors and contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any company or organization discussed. All content is based on publicly available information, including but not limited to news reports, press releases, SEC filings, and publicly shared industry data. Nothing on this site should be construed as professional, legal, or financial advice.

    Some articles on this site are researched and drafted with the assistance of AI tools and are reviewed, fact-checked, and edited by Winning With Walmart editors before publication. Editorial judgment, sourcing decisions, and final approval rest with the publication’s human editors in every case.

    We are committed to accuracy and fairness. If you believe any content on this site contains an error or requires clarification, we welcome your feedback and will promptly review and address any concerns.

    ©2026 Winning With Walmart. All Rights Reserved.